|
|
|
January
7, 2003
|
Surgical
Eyes News
|
Volume
1, Number 2
|
A
monthly E-Journal
|
|
|
Recently,
I had a patient that relayed the following story.
She had undergone refractive surgery, but was left
with a less than satisfactory outcome. She sought
assistance from her previous eye doctor who did not
recommend the surgery. The patient was rebuked and
told, "I told you not to have the surgery! You should
have listened!" Her old doctor refused to help her
and told the patient to go back to her surgeon. This
was disappointing to hear.
A challenging
visual outcome weighs on all doctors from a humanitarian
standpoint. At Surgical Eyes, we are committed to
exploring all available technologies and shedding
light on them in order to offer assistance and hope
to those who may be in need. This newsletter is designed
to help provide suggestions to other doctors so that
their patients might ultimately benefit. We welcome
the cases that we have received and look forward to
having others to share in the near future.
Sincerely,
Gregg Eric Russell, OD
Chief Medical Editor
Co-MedicalDirector@surgicaleyes.org
|
s
|
s
|
|
tIN THIS ISSUE
|
|
|
Sponsored
by:

click
image to go to website
|
|
tFEATURE
CASE REPORT |
|
|

|
alue
s
|
|
Corneal
Topography before (left picture) and after (right picture) insertion
of Focus Night and Day contact lens.
|
|
s
|
Patient
EC is a 53 year old white male who presented with poor distance in
his right eye 3 years after undergoing an INTACS procedure. Distance
visual problems included severe ghosting and distortion of images,
especially in the right eye and worse in dim illumination. His preoperative
prescription was -1.75 in both eyes. His medical and family histories
were unremarkable. He was not taking any medications. He did not exhibit
any clinical signs of dry eye and showed no ocular signs of GPC or
other eyelid anomalies.
Uncorrected
visual acuity is 20 / 30 and 20 / 20 right and left eye respectively.
With a glasses correction of +0.50 -2.25 x 110 and -0.25 -0.50 X 110,
the patient could see 20 / 25- and 20 / 20. Ghosting was greatly reduced,
but a trial fit of the glasses prescription made the patient feel
very disoriented and dizzy. Topography of the right eye follows. Corneal
Topography before (left picture) and after (right picture) insertion
of Focus Night and Day contact lens.
Diagnosis:
Irregular Astigmatism of Unknown Origin
An attempt
was made to fit the patient in 8.4 base curve, +0.50 Focus Night and
Day contact lens in the right eye. Acuity improved to 20 / 20- with
the contact lens on after 30 minutes. The patient did, however, notice
an immediate improvement in visual sharpness even though acuity improved
less than 1 line of letters. Topography over the top of the contact
lens shows reduction in the irregular astigmatism. The patient was
able to tolerate the lens extremely well and wound up wearing the
lens continuously for 3 weeks time. Topography measures were repeated
weekly to insure progress. After 3 weeks of wear, the double vision
had been eliminated and visual acuity had returned to a sharp 20 /
20.
Observations:
This is a classic example of how some problems can be "fixed" with
simple and straight forward solutions. While this patient improved
visual acuity only slightly, his higher order aberrations were decreased
more than 50% by simply wearing the soft contact lens. The "stiffer"
material used in the Focus Night and Day does a good job in optically
"smoothing" the outer surface of the cornea and can be credited with
improving the patient's vision. Caution should be exercised when attempting
such a fit to make sure that the patient is able to comfortably wear
the lens. Topography over the top of the contact lens will often show
a reduction in the amount of corneal astigmatism. Care must also be
given to fit a material that is more likely to maintain sufficient
lens hydration to avoid concurrent visual blur due to disrupted lens
optics.
To submit an article,
contact lens or surgical case case report, please email
Co-MedicalDirector@surgicaleyes.org.
|
| tDOCTOR
QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSTOPERATIVE CARE |
|
s
If you have postrefractive patients with long-standing complications,
what is the complaint you hear most often?
1) Dry Eye
2) Quality of Night Vision
3) Quality of Day and Night Vision
4) None of Above
5) All of the Above
Please
click
here to answer the above poll. s
Last
months poll results:
How do
you diagnose dry eye in postrefractive patients?
1) Clinical signs, including shallow tear lake and punctate staining
- 17%
2) Clinical tests, including Shirmers - 0%
3) Combination of all - 66%
4) Other - 17%
5) None of the above
|
| tREFRACTIVE
EYE CARE NEWS |
|
s
Mismatch between the flap and stromal areas after laser in situ keratomileusis
as source of flap striae. William N. Charman, DSc. Journal of
Cataract and Refractive Surgery: Volume 28 Number 12 (December 2002)
Pages 2146–2152.
Researcher theoretically calculated the magnitude of the excess area
between the lower surface of a LASIK flap and the underlying ablated
stroma. Noted was the effect of the geometric mismatch that could
have clinical consequences. More
Fenestrations Enhance Tear Mixing under Silicone-Hydrogel
Contact Lenses. Naoko Asano-Kato aAIkuko Toda, et. al. American
Journal of Ophthalmology; Volume 134 Issue 6 (December 2002) Pages
801-807. Twenty
subjects were fitted with two pairs of silocone hydrogel, one pair
with fenestration to investigate the effects of fenestrations on tear
exchange under an SCL. Tear-mixing efficiency was improved and tear-film
thickness needs to be quantitatively measured to accurately predict
the effects of lens parameters on tear mixing. More
Reading
the waves: Recognize common problem patterns Marguerite
B. McDonald, MD. Eyeworld; Volume 8 No 1 (January
3, 2003) Page 36. More
Research
Editor Note: This article is interesting, not because of the hype
of fixing the vision quality problems caused by refractive surgery,
but because wavefront measurements are now providing objective evidence
that a sizeable number of people really do not see very well after
refractive surgery. In the past few months there has been a slow shift
in the RS industry journals away from the hype of correcting everyone
to 20/15 and 20/10 to a recognized need to be able to correct people
to a good quality 20/20.
s
|
|
tSPOTLIGHT PROFILE
|
|
s
Dr. Grant Mason
B.Sc.Optom.
Melbourne University, 1984; M.Optom. University of New South Wales,
1996; Fellow, Australian College of Behavioural Optometry; Fellow,
College of Optometrists in Visual Development; Level 2 Sports Vision
Accreditation, Sports Vision Australia.
Member, Optometrists Association Children's Vision Taskforce, 2002
Member, Optometrists Association Public Awareness Committee, 2000-
Head Examiner, Sports Vision Australia. 1997-
Senior Optometrist, Sydney Olympic Games, 2000
Senior Optometrist, Special Olympics, 2002
Family
- married, two sons, one daughter, two dogs and a tank full of
fish.
Hobbies
- Finding time to fit hobbies in, Science fiction novels, Star Trek
videos (TNG still rules), Red Wine, driving with my car roof down.
Optometry
is a profession that provides both an intellectual challenge and spiritual
satisfaction. I find it rewarding to help others and derive great
satisfaction from seeing patients progress in life with my assistance.
s
Future
Profiles to follow from Top Doctor Posters
on our Bulletin Board:
W
Trattler MD, Gregg Russell OD, Ken Minarik OD, Frank Holly PhD, Ophthinfo
MD, James Salz MD, Clint Hoxie OD, Tracy Lynn Swarz, OD, Donald F. Ezekiel
OD, Steven Lee OD, Sam Omar MD, Alejandro Tirado OD, Demetrian Dornic
MD, Ricardo Trigo MD, Arthur Epstein OD, Chris Marmo OD, Hollis Stavn
OD, Eirit Yonatan OD, Paul Klein OD, Robert Bard OD, Neal A. Sher MD,
Dan Reinstein MD, Jim Dillard OD, Gregg Feinerman MD, Steven Shum OD,
Richard Bursua OD, Jason Jedlicka OD, Mark Ventocilla OD, Barrie Soloway
MD, Carlton Chan OD, Jack Miller OD, Brian Boxer Wachler MD, Ken Maller
OD, Joe B. Goldberg OD, Bruce Butts OD, Kraig Abe OD, Paul Blaze OD,
Frank Goes MD, Bill Berke OD, David L. Davidson OD, Joe B. Collins OD,
James Stevenot OD, Jeffrey Martin OD, Johnathan Christie, OD.
s
|
|
tFEATURED POSTINGS
from SE's BB |
|
Custom Cap Report
How
Accurate is LASIK in Correcting -.50?
Pilocarpine Worries - Need Doctor's Opinion
Iatrogenic
keratectasia: Current knowledge, current measurements
New
eye drop for dry eyes
Does
your Anger Increase or Decrease Over Time?
|
|
tANNOUNCEMENTS
and EVENTS |
|
| s |
|
- Live
Chat with participating doctor, Ken Minarik, OD
at on Sunday, January 12, 2002 from 9 to 11 EST.
- Visit
with us at the Contact Lens and Eyecare Symposium Meeting
in Orlando, FL from January 22 -26, 2002 in Booth
102. Also at the Symposium - SE participating doctor
Frank Holly, PhD will be presenting the The Harold
A. Stein, MD, Lectureship on Thursday, January 23rd in room
23-101A Level II.
- Surgical
Eyes Meeting at Cedar
Sinai, Los Angeles, CA - Saturday, February 15,
2003. Hosted by SE participating doctor James
Salz, MD. Please sign
up by February 12.
- Washington/Oregon
Support Group Meeting on Saturday, March 1st, 2003 at Vision NorthWest
in Tigard, Oregon, from Noon to 4:00 PM Lunch will be provided
from Noon to 1:00 PM with an open meeting from 1:00 to 4:00
PM.
John Wilkins, OD will be attending and will answer
as many questions as possible. Please contact organizer Brenda
Ross for more information!
- Pictures
from our past meetings at Emory
- Atlanta, GA and Cohosted
by Gelfex - New York, NY in 2002. Some of the presentations
made by doctors at both meetings will be available online.
- Surgical
Eyes Meeting at Indiana
Eye Care, Greenwood, IN - early March 2003 hosted
by Dr.
Charles McCormick III.
- Surgical
Eyes Meeting in London, England - early May 2003 hosted by
SE participating doctor Dan
Reinstein, MD.
|
| tCLASSIFIED
ADS |
|
s
The Surgical Eyes Web Site received over 14,275,000 hits in 2002 alone.
This Newsletter is now featured on the front page of our Web Site
and emailed monthly to over 3,280 registered users of the Surgical
Eyes Bulletin Board - a technologically sophisticated interactive
forum on refractive surgery complications featuring interaction between
leading MDs, ODs, PhDs and a caring global network of patient participants.
Place your ad here
today!
s
|
|
ss
Chief
Medical Editor
Gregg Russell, OD
Editor/Art/Production/Circulation
Ron Link
s
|
s
Research Editors
• Karl Albert
• Mark Bilafore
• Paul Fitzpatrick
• John Vernosky
|
s
TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE, CONTACT LENS OR SURGICAL CASE REPORT:
Email Co-MedicalDirector@surgicaleyes.org.
TO
SUBMIT NEWS:
E-mail news@surgicaleyes.org
or FAX your news to: 813-258-8601.
TO SPONSOR OR PLACE CLASSIFIED ADS:
Surgical Eyes News has over 3,280 subscribers comprised of
medical professionals and patients from around the globe.
For information on sponsorships of this e-mail
newsletter and classified ads, please email
sponsor-classifieds@surgicaleyes.org.
s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|